Criminality and UK Visa Applications in 2026

If you have ever had a run-in with the law, even something you considered minor at the time, it is sensible to pause before making any UK immigration application in 2026. The Home Office has a structured approach to criminality that can lead to refusal, or in some cases cancellation of existing permission, even where you meet every other requirement of the visa route.

The key point is this. Criminality is assessed under the Immigration Rules and Home Office guidance, not on what an applicant feels was “serious” or “a long time ago”. The guidance used by decision makers was updated on 11 November 2025 and aligns criminality decisions with Part Suitability, which replaced the older Part 9 refusal framework.

Why this matters more in 2026

The Home Office approach is designed to be consistent across most routes, whether you are applying from overseas, extending inside the UK, or applying for settlement. Under Part Suitability, the decision maker starts by asking a strict question: does a mandatory rule apply. If yes, refusal or cancellation follows. If no, only then does discretion come into play.

This is why applicants are often caught out. People prepare the “eligibility” side of a visa, salary, relationship evidence, maintenance, accommodation, but underestimate “suitability”.

Part Suitability and the criminality rules

Part Suitability sets out the criminality grounds in plain rule form. The headline mandatory refusal rule applies where there is a custodial sentence of 12 months or more, where a person is classed as a persistent offender showing particular disregard for the law, or where an offence caused serious harm.

There is also a separate rule for visitors and people seeking entry for less than six months. In those cases, even a non custodial outcome or an out of court disposal can trigger refusal if it is recent, and the rules focus heavily on whether at least 12 months has passed since the end of a short custodial sentence or since the conviction date for non custodial outcomes.

Mandatory refusal: when the Home Office has little room to move

Custodial sentence of 12 months or more

If an applicant has received a custodial sentence of 12 months or more, the rule position is that the application must be refused. This applies to convictions in the UK and convictions overseas, and it is not limited to recent offences.

A common misconception is that “it was overseas, so it will not matter”. In practice, the Home Office can and does consider overseas convictions under the same framework.

Persistent offending

The guidance makes clear there is no magic number of offences. Decision makers look at patterns and frequency. A small number of minor offences over a long period may be treated differently from repeated offences over a short period, especially where behaviour escalates.

Serious harm

The guidance explains serious harm broadly. It can include serious physical or psychological harm to a victim, or conduct that contributes to wider harm in society. Certain categories, such as violent, sexual, racially motivated, or drug related offending, will commonly be treated as serious harm, and a short sentence does not automatically prevent that finding.

Discretionary refusal: where the details of your case become decisive

If you have a custodial sentence under 12 months, or a non-custodial sentence or out of court disposal recorded on your criminal record, the rules allow refusal on a discretionary basis in many routes.

The Home Office guidance shows what decision makers are expected to weigh. Timing since the offence, whether you already hold lawful permission, whether offending began soon after arrival, the relevance of the offence to the route, and your ties to the UK can all matter.

This is where careful legal presentation often makes the difference, because discretion is not sympathy. It is an evidence-based assessment.

Visitors and short stays: why the bar is often higher

Visitor applications can be refused under a stricter rule set. For short stays, the Home Office looks closely at how recent the offence was and applies a time-based test. For example, a recent non custodial disposal or a short custodial sentence can lead to refusal where the relevant 12 month period has not yet passed.

This catches people planning urgent travel, family weddings, business trips, or last-minute visits, particularly where they assume a fine or caution is “too minor to matter”.

“Minor” outcomes that still need to be handled properly

One of the most practical parts of the Home Office guidance is its treatment of common disposals.

A fine is treated as part of a criminal record and must be declared where the form asks for it. Multiple fines can contribute to a persistent offender assessment.

Fixed penalty notices are not always criminal record events, but if they escalate into court proceedings or relate to non payment and a conviction results, the conviction is what matters for immigration. Cautions and similar disposals can be recorded and can be relevant, depending on the type and whether they are spent under the applicable rules. The guidance also highlights that applicants need to understand what must be declared and what must not be relied upon incorrectly.

Criminality can affect existing permission, not just new applications

People often focus on refusals, but Part Suitability also includes cancellation powers. The rules allow cancellation of entry clearance or permission in both mandatory and discretionary scenarios, and the guidance confirms cancellation can apply even if the person was granted permission years earlier.

For Skilled Workers and other long term routes, a conviction during lawful residence can therefore have consequences beyond the next extension.

Practical examples we see in real life

A Skilled Worker is applying for settlement and forgets to mention an overseas conviction from many years ago because they assumed it was irrelevant. The issue is not only the offence. The failure to disclose can damage credibility and create an avoidable risk.

A visitor wants to attend a family event in London but received a non-custodial disposal recently. Under the visitor rules, recency can be decisive, and applying at the wrong time can lead to refusal even where the person has strong reasons to visit.

A spouse visa applicant has several low-level matters across a short period. Each one looks minor alone, but together they can be assessed as a pattern and invite a persistent offender analysis.

What you should do before you apply

The safest approach is to treat criminality as a legal issue, not a box-ticking issue. Get clarity on exactly what happened, the disposal type, the dates, and whether anything is recorded, including overseas matters. Then align your strategy with the correct rule and guidance.

Just as importantly, be consistent and transparent. The Home Office guidance expects full and accurate consideration of criminal history, and a well-prepared application usually anticipates how a caseworker will read the facts.

How GigaLegal Solicitors can help

At GigaLegal Solicitors in London, we advise applicants and sponsors on criminality related risks across visitor visas, work routes, family routes, extensions, and settlement. We can assess whether the issue is likely to trigger mandatory refusal, where discretion may apply, and how best to present rehabilitation, context, and proportionality with the right supporting evidence.

Speak to our team

If you are concerned that a conviction, caution, fine, or overseas offence could affect a UK visa application in 2026, contact GigaLegal Solicitors for a confidential assessment before you submit. Early advice can prevent avoidable refusals and help you choose the right timing and strategy.

Important disclaimer

This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration outcomes depend on your full history and the route you are applying under, and the Home Office can update guidance and policy.

‍