GigaLegal’s family law team sees the same pattern every year: as Christmas approaches, emotions rise, communication breaks down, and children become caught in the middle. What should be a magical and carefree time can quickly feel tense and uncertain, especially when parents leave arrangements until the last minute.
Our experts have dealt with cases ranging from parents who co-operate beautifully to those who cannot exchange a single message without conflict. Through all those experiences, one thing has consistently proven true: children cope better when their Christmas plans are known early, and the adults remain focused on their well-being.
For many families, the difficulty begins with timing. By mid-November, our inbox is filled with urgent emails from parents who suddenly cannot agree on Christmas Eve or Christmas Day.Unfortunately, when discussions are left this late, stress escalates and flexibility disappears. We still remember a father who contacted us on 22 December, insisting he would not miss Christmas Eve with his child. The mother had already booked international travel months earlier, and with no emergency court availability, the boy spent the holiday surrounded by conflict rather than celebration. Had those conversations happened in October, the entire experience would have looked different. Early planning gives families breathing space to think calmly, co-ordinate diaries, and prepare children for what to expect.
It is also important for parents to understand what parental responsibility really means in the context of Christmas arrangements. Under the Children Act 1989, everyone who holds parental responsibility must be part of the decision-making process, whether that concerns where the child spends Christmas morning, how long they stay with each parent, or whether they travel abroad for the holidays. A parent cannot unilaterally decide how Christmas will work, even if they are the primary carer. That said, having parental responsibility does not automatically entitle a parent to Christmas contact if there are genuine safeguarding concerns. As of 2025, the law continues to distinguish clearly between parental responsibility and physical time with a child.
Even when parents communicate well, our family law experts always encourage them to put their Christmas arrangements in writing. A simple message confirming dates, handover times, and logistics avoids countless misunderstandings. We recall one family where the mother believed the child would spend “Christmas Day with Dad” for lunch, while the father assumed this meant waking up at his home. Neither parent was being unreasonable, they simply interpreted the same words differently. A written agreement, even if informal, would have prevented that tearful Christmas morning. Where a Child Arrangements Order is already in place, parents should remember that its terms remain binding unless they both agree to any temporary changes.
In practice, there is no single “correct” way to divide the festive period. Some families alternate Christmas each year, others divide the day into two parts, and many parents choose to split the school holiday rather than Christmas Day itself. The best arrangements are tailored around the child: their routine, their needs, their age, and the practical realities of distance. Courts are generally reluctant to order long journeys or multiple handovers on Christmas Day, especially for younger children who benefit from stability and familiarity.
When communication starts to break down, mediation becomes invaluable. We often find that parents who cannot speak constructively in private find a way forward with the support of a neutral mediator. The Family Court continues to encourage mediation as a first step, not just because it is more cost-effective, but because it preserves a level of cooperation that children desperately need. If mediation fails, parents may need to apply to the court, but court capacity around December is limited and urgent applications are usually reserved for safeguarding issues. This is yet another reason why leaving arrangements late rarely ends well.
If the matter does reach the Family Court, the judge will focus entirely on the child’s welfare, guided by the statutory welfare checklist. The court will consider the child’s emotional wellbeing, their need for stability during a busy holiday period, and each parent’s ability to support a positive relationship with the other. Although the law in 2025 still presumes that a child benefits from the involvement of both parents, that presumption is quickly displaced if a parent cannot prioritise the child’s welfare during conflict.
Finally, we always remind parents of the importance of keeping clear records of discussions. Emails, messages, travel confirmations, or notes of mediation sessions can become essential if the dispute later requires legal intervention. Parents who act reasonably and demonstrate consistency are invariably in a stronger position, even if the disagreement becomes more serious.
Christmas contact disputes rarely stem from the holiday itself, they often reflect deeper difficulties in communication and trust. But with early preparation, honest dialogue, and afirm focus on the child’s needs, parents can avoid unnecessary conflict and create a holiday experience their child will remember for the right reasons.
Cosidering seeking expert advice from 5-star-rated family law expert? Contact GigaLegal Solicitors and book a free telephone consultation.
At GigaLegal, we treat your legal matters with the same care and urgency as if they were our own. Our highly experienced solicitors are committed to protecting your rights, freedoms, and future. With a results-driven mindset and a deep sense of responsibility, we work tirelessly to deliver the strongest possible outcome for every client we serve.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)